The vaccine empire has collapsed

You may not have heard the explosion, but it happened.

A review from The Cochrane Collaboration, a widely respected research-analysis team, went over all the evidence, and entered its conclusion:

In healthy adults, no flu vaccine delivers protection from the flu.


It doesn’t protect against transmission of flu viruses from person to person, either.


So all the promotion and all the pandering and all the scare tactics and all the “expert medical opinion” and all the media coverage…useless, worthless, and irrelevant.

Billions of dollars of financed lies about flu vaccines were just that: lies.

It gets worse, because the entire theory about how and why vaccines work is sitting on a razor’s edge, ready to fall into the abyss of discarded fairy tales.

We’ve been told that vaccines stimulate the immune system with a “rehearsal” of what will happen when an actual disease comes down the pipeline. When the disease does show up, the immune system will be locked and loaded, ready to destroy the attacking germ.

But since flu vaccines don’t protect against flu or even stop the transmission of flu viruses from person to person, the so-called “rehearsing” of the immune system is merely somebody’s fancy story. A legend. A myth.

Also, you can forget about the widely sold herd-immunity tale. How can the group be immune when vaccines are doing nothing to prevent the free movement of germs from person to person?

As always, The Cochrane Collaboration did an exhaustive review of all previous studies on flu vaccines they could discover. They rejected the studies that were badly constructed. In some cases, to expand available data, they contacted individual researchers who had conducted studies.

Therefore, Cochrane’s findings represent the best of the published literature on flu vaccines. However, because the Cochrane team owes nothing to pharmaceutical companies, they analyzed the literature with sober eyes and minds.

Here is an interesting comment from the analysis: “The review showed that reliable evidence on influenza vaccines is thin but there is evidence of widespread manipulation of conclusions…”

Now who in the world would benefit from such manipulating?

Oh yes. One other thing.

The Cochrane review, published by John Wiley and Sons, appeared online on July 7, 2010.

Over two years ago.

We must have missed the massive mainstream media coverage. Perhaps we were fishing that day, or buying tires for the car, or vacationing on our yachts in the Mediterranean.

What? There was no massive media coverage? Impossible. I mean, surely…

Sources: (registration required)

Jon Rappoport
The author of an explosive collection, THE MATRIX REVEALED, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world.

About the author:
The author of an explosive new collection, THE MATRIX REVEALED, Jon
was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of
California. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an
investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics,
medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine,
Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon
has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic,
and creative power to audiences around the world.

Trending on the Web

39 Responses to "The vaccine empire has collapsed"

  1. Maria João Risse  October 14, 2012 at 10:05 pm


    • Dr. C  October 15, 2012 at 2:13 am

      I hate to be “that guy”, but this article is full of shit. The resources link to non-credible, and general missinterpretations of the study at large. The original study at hand does not mention either efficacy of vaccines, or transmission of influenza from person to person. I know no one will read this, but as a virologist I have to stand on my soap box, and encourage people to read accurate information.

      This is the original study that the author of this article referenced

      If anyone here has any questions, or would like to learn more about vaccines and viruses leave your email address in a response. I would be happy to help anyone clear up any miscommunications, and misunderstandings.

      -Dr. C

    • Fox news propaganda  October 25, 2012 at 7:26 pm

  2. Bruce Patin  October 14, 2012 at 10:37 pm

    I only got my sons and me flu shots when my Dad was sick with lung problems, and we couldn’t risk him catching anything from us, because that would have killed him. Now that he is dead, I am not getting anymore flu shots for either me or my children. I feel empowered now when I deliberately ignore those signs urging us to get flu shots.

  3. Jack  October 14, 2012 at 10:44 pm

    So did smallpox just decide to call it a day in the 1970s? Did polio decide that it had killed enough people? Howe about rubella? Mumps? Measles? Hepatitis? If vaccines don’t work, what happened to all of devastating diseases in the developed world? The flu vaccine is unique – a new one must be made every year because the virus adapts so quickly. The conclusions of ONE study on ONE vaccine do not invalidate decades of scientific research and data that support the efficacy of vaccines. They work.

    • Egil  October 14, 2012 at 10:58 pm

      Thank you Jack, I’m always so relieved after reading this completely awful and stupid misleading posts and find a sensible voice like yours in the comment section showing there knowledge out there, I am so tired of this site and it’s ridiculousness

    • Zak  October 14, 2012 at 11:40 pm

      The worst ones are the “smoke weed it’s natural and good for you.”
      Bloody hell.

    • Marton  October 15, 2012 at 12:52 am


      “The Cochrane Collaboration did an exhaustive review of all previous studies on flu vaccines they could discover. They rejected the studies that were badly constructed. In some cases, to expand available data, they contacted individual researchers who had conducted studies.”

      did you read it at all or just skim it for highlights? I haven’t even looked past this postings claims.. YET! However I already know that their claim is they went over many different types of vaccines only rejecting ones that were “badly constructed” and even went further to get additional information from specific researchers involved with the studies.

      I’m sorry but I’m more inclined to agree that flu shots are ridiculously worthless considering we’ve had a cure for cancer on the market being used as a treatment for other things but because it won’t make pharmaceutical companies money it more than likely will not be pushed through human testing and used.

      Here is a youtube clip proving my statement from an actual news release.

      Now tell me to trust pharma companies.

    • petrots  October 15, 2012 at 8:58 pm

      Actually, ‘polio’ kept killing people that had been vaccinated against it.
      If you’re so sure of the vaccine’s effectiveness you will have no issue reading these:

    • Ryan  October 21, 2012 at 8:42 am

      Exactly! Nice to see a lucid post on this.

      Irresponsible sensationalism at best.

      As much as the mainstream media undoubtedly has a bias, so does the alternative media.

      I wonder what these individuals will have to say if the anti- vaccine movement goes mainstream and and we have polio and smallpox etc. running wild?

      I wonder if they have contemplated the morality (let alone the ethics) of facilitating the infection of thousands (if we are lucky)? I doubt it.

    • Zeke  October 22, 2012 at 4:35 pm

      “So did smallpox just decide to call it a day in the 1970s? Did polio decide that it had killed enough people? Howe about rubella? Mumps? Measles? Hepatitis?”

      In a word; YES!

      Here is a link to some graphs, for your consideration;

      Vaccines are taking the credit for the results of available clean running water and refrigeration. Without those, disease rates climb dramatically.

    • Ryan  October 25, 2012 at 8:55 am

      If sanitation is the cause can you please explain the re-emergence of the disease in Africa in 2010? And in regions of Africa where sanitation due to socio-political and economic constraints has never been of a first world standard.

      Or how in South Africa who maintains a poilo vaccination policy , despite the countries lack of first world sanitation infrastructure in (still too many) rural areas, there has been a handful of cases of Polio since the introduction of vaccines- the last confirmed case in 1989?

      The only covariant factor his lax vaccination policy- sanitation measures haven’t changed.

    • Robert  October 23, 2012 at 5:59 am

      You need to review past epidemiology charts that clearly indicate many disease were on the decline prior to specific vaccines being produced. We have mostly herd immunity and sanitation engineers to thank for disease eradication.

    • SculptorAlison  October 24, 2012 at 3:03 am

      Smallpox was eradicated because of quarantine and sanitation. Just like tuberculosis and cholera. There are reasonable arguments that polio was partially caused by pesticides and also after the vaccine the definition for polio changed and the cases reported as polio dropped off accordingly. This also isn’t the conclusion of one study, this is a review of many, many studies to really see what the end results are since money can cause researchers to interpret studies in bizarre ways. You might think vaccines are the be all end all, but people who don’t aren’t simply ignoramuses.

  4. Horatio Swabs  October 14, 2012 at 10:54 pm

    I just did some reading about the Cochrane collaboration and it seems pretty legit. I am not some anti vaccine wackadoo. Though in the case of the flu vaccine it seems to be the consistent conclusion that it is useless. I guess I come away just thinking not all vaccines are the same.

  5. Christopher Thomas  October 14, 2012 at 10:56 pm

    flu vaccines probably don’t work very well because it mutates so fast that by the time you’ve got it, it’s already different from the one you’re primed against. That said, you’ve given you immune system a valuable set of information about the flu virus, so combined with the immunity you’ll gain from future infections, it’ll help you in the long term.

    however, the best way to protect against the flu is not to get tired, because if you are well rested and get enough sleep then your immune system is already strong and fighting fit, vaccines don’t hurt, but it just means it’s less necessary.

    a tired, sleepy immune system is a weak immune system, but it will never get rid of that pesky herpes or cancer you picked up along the road, you still need to goto the doctor for those, just like you’d expect any other person to do so.

  6. Tuukka Lampela  October 14, 2012 at 11:02 pm

    The FLU vaccine empire has collapsed. A dangerous generalization you make. I ask you to change the title of this article to a more descripting one. Thank you.

    • Riley  October 15, 2012 at 12:24 am

      I agree, seems rather misleading. The whole seem thing was pretty one-sided.

  7. Dan Banan  October 14, 2012 at 11:20 pm

    This article need better sources. Not that I don’t trust its content or think it’s invalid… it just doesn’t come off as believable with the current sources. My 2 cents :)

  8. Marvel  October 14, 2012 at 11:56 pm

    This is what happens when uninformed people try to write about the things they know absolutely nothing about.

  9. Zeb  October 15, 2012 at 12:20 am

    I don’t think the fact that there are outbreaks periodically which can easily be manipulated means vaccines are the reason for this controlling them, that’s obvious. Regardless of whether or not you believe in vaccines you should be educated enough to know eugenics is very real and very relevant in today’s society. The idea of a credible source is mostly confused with what is really just a widely accepted source too.

  10. nurse  October 15, 2012 at 12:52 am

    The flu is a VIRUS of course its not going to work properly it just helps PREVENT it

  11. Marton  October 15, 2012 at 1:10 am

    The whole world needs to adopt a policy that is followed in Japan if we TRULY wish to reduce the spread of airborne diseases. My dad was over there in the 90’s were a commercial fishing family have been for generations, he won a trip to tour the various fish plants of Japan. While there I guess it was the cold/flu season and he started noticing right away that a lot of people were wearing doctors masks.. He asked one of the guides what that was all about and he said to prevent spreading of germs anyone who gets sick during cold/flu seasons wears a mask out of COURTESY TO OTHER PEOPLE.

    Another courtesy they have is if you are behind another vehicle driving at night your lights go OFF not set on “low beams”, they’re just turned off. Don’t know how many times I’ve had some puny lil prick in a jacked up truck annoy and distract the hell out of me with his “low beams” when a more proper thing to do would be to turn his lights off. But hey were not actually trying to help each other are we. Competitive world.. dog eat dog and all that crap.

  12. Kevin Stuart  October 15, 2012 at 1:20 am

    @ Jack This was not only one study, it was a review of all flu-vaccine studies discovered.
    Cochrane collaboration is one of the most respected and best independent research institutes there is so this study is with all probability very reliable and authoritative.

    • Mike P  October 15, 2012 at 3:03 am

      Cochrane is a very reliable and unbiased source, but the author of this article is incorrect in stating that the Cochrane collaborative included “all previous studies on flu vaccines they could discover” in their review. Cochrane reviews exclude the majority of available studies because they are not a specific study type or not pertaining to the narrowly defined population being studied (in this case, US adults in good health). There are definitely more than 50 scientific studies on flu vaccines, I assure you.

  13. Alex  October 15, 2012 at 2:04 am

    /vimeo. com/49158454 says it all…

  14. Mike P  October 15, 2012 at 2:57 am

    Judging by the way he mangles the conclusion of the study, it’s hard to believe that the author has experience reporting on health and science. Here’s is a summary of the authors’ conclusions (which you can view for free by following the author’s link and clicking the “abstract” tab):

    “Influenza vaccines have a modest effect in reducing influenza symptoms and working days lost. There is no evidence that they affect complications, such as pneumonia, or transmission.”

    So the conclusion of the review is that flu vaccines offer moderate protection to healthy adults. Also note that saying “there is no evidence [in the reviewed studies] that x is true” is not the same thing as “we conclude that x is not true.” As one commenter has already noted, this a review of one specific vaccine in one specific population. Nowhere in the text do the authors suggest that theory behind vaccines has been disproved.

    The fact that the author willfully ignores the conclusions of the review and instead presents his own warped interpretation is really just sad.

    Boom, indeed.

  15. sonizuki  October 15, 2012 at 3:13 am

    like what the billionaire from microsoft says.. there will be a vaccine explosion which will help for depopulation.. hahaha.. its hard to believe it came from him.. but he said that on national tv…

  16. David  October 15, 2012 at 3:15 am

    Are you stupid? ….anyone with partial intelligence knows the flu vaccine does not prevent the transmission of the virus, and it only allows your immune system to build antibodies to fight that particular strain of virus. What they do is see which virus is breaking out in other parts of the world and try to anticipate which one will break out here in North America. Problem lies in they are wrong more than right, and the virus may mutate and change and thus our immune system has no antibodies to fight it off quickly. The injection you get is a mild form of the actual virus, it allows your bodies immune system to develop antibodies needed to fight off the full blown virus when you become infected with it. So when the actual virus enters your body, your immune system recognizes it right away and dispatches the necessary antibodies and killer T cells to fight the already known virus. Before going off like a retarded little bitch know your science….hahaha.

  17. sonizuki  October 15, 2012 at 3:40 am

    we all have the cjoices.. what is good for our children.. but now society is telling us that new borns must have these shots.. they cant even enroll in schools if they dont get the shot… we have the state of the art medical facilities and a wide range of drugs available.. why do we need to disrupt our childs immune system development by forcing all this chemicals at them. see the evidence on how new vaccines affect infants.. investigate.. its out there

    • Ljere  October 23, 2012 at 2:11 am

      I agree completely. Why do we need to be forcing chemicals into our newborn babies bodies and their maturing immune systems. It’s just not right. Why don’t people look at the autism epidemic we are having now and talk to people whose children have been vaccine injured. It’s so scary to me that the majority of people out there trust some person in a white lab coat somewhere far away to tell you what is right for your child. Be smart, you know your child the best. Do what is right. If that’s vaccinating them then so be it. All I know is I’m not giving my children a chemical milkshake any time soon.

  18. Jo  October 15, 2012 at 3:41 am

    What a load of horsehsit. You’ve fallen for the same propaganda that you seek to warn people about.

  19. Phillip Ian  October 15, 2012 at 4:55 am

    Pointless, fellow truth seekers. To try and help those people who don’t want to be saved. Like children, they will learn the hard way. Some will get sick, some will die from it. They do not seek the truth, but enjoy living in fear. The ones I feel for the most are these people’s children who do not have a choice and become victims of
    their parents arrogance.

  20. John  October 15, 2012 at 10:46 am

    I suggest that those who do not understand the power of a systematic review of the literature take a look at the Wikipedia page “Hierarcy of evidence”. The really interesting part of this is that the scientific hierarchy is almost the inverse of the public perception as reflected in the media, who always wheel out “an expert” rather than reviewing the data.

  21. James  October 22, 2012 at 6:09 am

    After the last time I got a flu shot, I got the flu. So since that time, I have refused the shot. So guess what. I never got the flu and that’s been around 10 years. So to the companies that have made MONEY hand or FIST. You can go straight to HELL.

  22. debespace  October 25, 2012 at 6:02 pm

    Michael Wagnitz: Scientists find correlation between autism and aluminium in vaccines


    Print Email

    February 05, 2012 5:45 am • MICHAEL WAGNITZ | local guest columnist

    (0) Comments

    It’s now been almost three years since I wrote a column in The Capital Times about our ignoring of safety data concerning the use of the neurotoxin aluminium in vaccines. At that time there were no studies examining its use in childhood vaccines and the explosion in autism affecting our children. This has since changed.

    In November, a group of scientists from the University of British Columbia published a paper in the Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry titled “Do aluminium vaccine adjuvants contribute to the rising prevalence of autism?”

    Aluminium is used as an adjuvant in vaccines to provoke a strong immune response to the vaccine antigen. Aluminium-containing vaccines are administered at birth and again at 2, 4, 6, 12 and 18 months of age in the U.S. As both a neurotoxin and immune stimulator, aluminium is especially problematic when considering neuro-immune diseases such as autism. Aluminium vaccine adjuvants have been linked to a variety of adult autoimmune disorders such as Gulf War syndrome, yet newborns and infants are being exposed to much higher levels than adults. This is especially problematic when weight and blood volumes of infants are considered.

    The authors of the above mentioned study looked at rates of autism in the U.S., United Kingdom, Australia, Canada, Sweden, Finland and Iceland. They found the highest autism rate in the UK, where aluminium is administered at birth and again at one month of age. The next highest rate was in the U.S., where aluminium is administered at birth and again at two months of age. The lowest rates were in Iceland and Finland, where aluminium is not used until three months of age. The rates of autism in Iceland and Finland is 12:10,000 as opposed to a rate of 110:10,000 in the U.S., an almost ten-fold difference. The rate in the UK is even worse at 157:10,000. This correlation has to be hard to ignore even for the most strident vaccine defenders.

    Autism in Wisconsin is occurring at epidemic levels. Isn’t it time our highly paid researchers stopped wasting precious time and money on genetics, epidemiology and useless brain scans and immediately start researching the most obvious environmental causes? Common sense should tell us there is no such thing as a genetic epidemic.

    Michael Wagnitz of Madison is a clinical metals chemist.


    Autism, University Of British Columbia, Aluminium, Vaccine, Research

    View (0) Comments

    Like · · Unfollow Post · Share · Delete

    Deborah Elthalion i got a nasty shock when reading the statistics of Iceland & finland who dont give a vaccine at birth & wait for 3 months befor giving a baby any jabs have only 12 in 10.000 get autism as aposed to 150 from the USA & UK, why because USA & UK give new .

  23. Jack  October 25, 2012 at 11:33 pm

    the reactions to this article are interesting as well as telling and also instructive! every year names are struck off the seasonal flu list because nolonger “need” a shot of the flu (deceased)

  24. new illuminati  October 29, 2012 at 8:34 am

    Those who exclusively accept information that’s tailored by (in)vested interests can’t be expected to realise that most of what they think they ‘know’ is not only incorrect but carefully fabricated disinformation. Most epidemics that vaccines are credited with ending had already run their courses and were actually tailing out in rapid decline when the (often substandard and contaminated) vaccine was introduced.The recent polio vaccination campaign in India has resulted in 50,000 CASES OF PARALYSIS and a fresh epidemic of polio – the altered form found in the vaccine, not its ‘natural’ counterpart.Do some real research. start with the articles assembled at Those who profit from the misery of others cannot be trusted.

  25. zukies26  December 19, 2012 at 8:47 am

    you people who believe flu shots are good are sheep very ignorant sheep, i feel bad for your kids putting pure poisons in a babies bodies is not only wrong but pure evil. do you know how many toxic stuff is in them, and how many horrible diseases can be traced to them since 70s. you have to be very stupid to believe anything from government or pharmacutical companies.where did alzheimers and autism come from, not to mention they dont work whatsoever. obviously a conspiracy by your own government spun by the media in a scare tactic campaign i would not doubt it if there were rfid chips in them now to go along with the aluminum, arsenic and mercury just to name a few in these shots f u government anyone who thinks the us leaders are the good guys are truly morons the rest of the world knows were not


Leave a Reply