Secret government documents reveal vaccines to be a total hoax

If you have children, you are more than likely already aware of the official U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) “Immunization Schedules,” which today recommend an astounding 29 vaccines be given between birth and six years of age, including yearly flu shots, as well as another five to 16 vaccines between ages seven and 18 (http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/schedules/). But a recent investigative report compiled by Dr. Lucija Tomljenovic, Ph.D., uncovers more than 30 years of hidden government documents exposing these vaccine schedules as a complete hoax, not to mention the fraud of the vaccines themselves to provide any real protection against disease.

Though her paper focuses primarily on the British health system’s elaborate cover-up of the dirty truth about its own national vaccination program, the tenets of the study’s findings still apply to vaccination schedules in general, which are typically designed for the purpose of serving corporate interests rather than public health. Government authorities, it turns out, in an ongoing bid to satisfy the private goals of the vaccine industry, have deliberately covered up pertinent information about the dangers and ineffectiveness of vaccines from parents in order to maintain a high rate of vaccination compliance. And in the process, they have put countless millions of children at risk of serious side effects and death.

You can access Dr. Tomljenovic’s full paper here:
http://www.ecomed.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/3-tomljenovic.pdf

Hiding the truth and covering up data to encourage vaccine compliance

Through several Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests, Dr. Tomljenovic was able to obtain transcripts of private meetings that were held between the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunization (JCVI), a so-called “independent expert advisory committee” that makes recommendations to the government about vaccine policy, and various British health ministers over the years. And after poring through this plethora of information, which had previously been veiled from public view, Dr. Tomljenovic made some disturbing discoveries.

“[T]he JCVI (Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunization) made continuous efforts to withhold critical data on severe adverse reactions and contraindications to vaccinations to both parents and health practitioners in order to reach overall vaccination rates which they deemed were necessary for ‘herd immunity,’ a concept which … does not rest on solid scientific evidence,” explains Dr. Tomljenovic in the introduction to her paper.

“Official documents obtained from the U.K. Department of Health (DH) and the JCVI reveal that the British health authorities have been engaging in such practice for the last 30 years, apparently for the sole purpose of protecting the national vaccination program.”

These are some strong accusations, but the information Dr. Tomljenovic gathered speaks for itself. Not only did the JCVI routinely ignore questions of safety as they came up with regards to the ever-expanding vaccination schedule, but the group actively censored unfavorable data that shed a “negative” light on vaccines in order to maintain the illusion that vaccines are safe and effective. Beyond this, the JCVI regularly lied to both the public and government authorities about vaccine safety in order to ensure that people continued to vaccinate their kids.

You can access Dr. Tomljenovic’s full paper here:
http://www.ecomed.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/3-tomljenovic.pdf

JCVI was fully aware of MMR vaccine dangers as early as 1989, but covered them up

Beginning on page three of her report, Dr. Tomljenovic begins outlining the sordid details of meetings held as early as 1981 where the JCVI clearly engaged in fraud, cover-up, and lies about vaccines to protect the vaccine industry, not children, from harm. Minutes from these meetings reveal that the JCVI actively tried to cover up severe side effects associated with common vaccines like measles and whooping cough (pertussis), both of which were clearly linked at the time to causing severe brain damage in a substantial percentage of the children that received them.

Of particular concern was how the JCVI handled unfavorable data on the controversial MMR vaccine for measles, mumps, and rubella. 10 years before Dr. Andrew Wakefield published his study on MMR in The Lancet, JCVI was already fully aware that the National Institute for Biological Standards and Control (NIBSC) had identified a clear link between MMR and vaccine-induced meningitis and encephalitis. But rather than come forward with this information and call for further safety assessments on the vaccine, the JCVI instead censored this critical information from the public, and blatantly lied about the safety of MMR for years.

“The extent of the JCVI’s concerns with the implications of scientific assessment of vaccine safety on vaccine policy explains why they were opposed to any long-term surveillance for severe neurological disorders following vaccination,” writes Dr. Tomljenovic. “[I]nstead of re-evaluating the vaccination policy, at least until safety concerns were fully evaluated, the JCVI chose to support the existing policy based on incomplete evidence that was available at that time.”

In other words, the JCVI was more concerned with protecting the reputation of the dangerous MMR vaccine, as well as many other questionable vaccines, than with protecting children from sustaining serious injuries as a result of getting the jabs. As far as the MMR vaccine is concerned, this critical piece of information not only reinforces the legitimacy of Dr. Wakefield’s findings from 10 years later, which were illegitimately declared to be fraudulent by the establishment, but also illustrates just how painfully long this scam has been taking place.

Vaccine companies urged to manipulate data sheets, skew safety studies to promote vaccines

If this is not bad enough, Dr. Tomljenovic also drudged up copious amounts of information on the JCVI’s longtime habit of encouraging vaccine companies to deliberately alter their data sheets in order to make dangerous and ineffective vaccines appear safe and effective, in accordance with their recommendations. When the JCVI’s guidance contraindications for MMR, for instance, did not match those of the vaccine’s manufacturer, JCVI apparently instructed the manufacturer to alter its data sheets to avoid “legal problems.”

Similarly, the JCVI’s official policy was to cherry-pick unreliable studies to support its own opinions on vaccines rather than rely on independent, scientifically-sound studies to make vaccine policy recommendations. Once again, the JCVI’s position on the safety and effectiveness of MMR is an excellent example of this, as the group flat out ignored legitimate MMR studies in favor of industry-backed junk studies like the infamous 2005 Cochrane Review, which technically proves nothing about the alleged safety of MMR because the 31 studies it evaluated did not even meet the group’s basic methodological criteria.

“Over the years, the JCVI has consistently promoted the MMR vaccine as safe, based on studies that have been proven to be either irrelevant, inconclusive, or methodologically questionable,” explains Dr. Tomljenovic, adding that the JCVI routinely chose to rely on flawed epidemiological studies that only identified “association” rather than “causation,” a rather ironic inaccuracy in light of how scrutinizing the establishment typically is of studies that contradict its own positions.

The eye-opening, 45-page paper goes on to explain how vaccine schedules were established through the calculated downplaying of vaccine safety concerns and the over-inflating of vaccine benefits; the promotion of dangerous new vaccines into the pediatric schedule through deception; the discouraging of vaccine safety follow-up studies; and the widespread brainwashing of the public through manipulation and scientific sleight-of-hand tricks.

Be sure to check out the complete study for yourself:
http://www.ecomed.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/3-tomljenovic.pdf

Sources for this article include:

http://childhealthsafety.wordpress.com

http://foodfreedomgroup.com

Trending on the Web
.

8 Responses to "Secret government documents reveal vaccines to be a total hoax"

  1. David  January 11, 2013 at 7:40 pm

    This article is misleading and misrepresents the cited study.

    Reply
    • fuckoff  January 11, 2013 at 9:52 pm

      you suck

  2. Erwin Brown  January 11, 2013 at 9:42 pm

    You have to learn to think for your self if you don’t want to die.

    Reply
  3. Tim  January 11, 2013 at 11:34 pm

    Sad to see you only reference three wordpress blogs and some random doctor’s documentation. Also, no definitions included in the document. I have a feeling the person who wrote this doesn’t fully grasp the topic. If you don’t get it, don’t write about it!

    Reply
  4. Jos  January 13, 2013 at 12:23 pm

    What a load of rubbish. These so called truth activists couldn’t possibly align themselves any further away from the truth. They should call themselves bullshit activists. As David says, the article is misleading and represents the cited study. If you could call it a study?

    Reply
  5. Sandy Ballard  January 17, 2013 at 2:47 am

    From personal experience, my Daughter almost died at 2 mths old from “BAD VACCINES”, at the time it was all over the T.V. about them!! The vaccines were from the 40’s and was a LIVE vaccine, it was for Whooping Cough!! Then I was sent into the unbelievable world,of kids crippled left with brain damage, I was not alone I was traumatized by the vaccines given to my child, they were forced upon us!! There s more than you could possibly know going on with these “FLU” shots and other free vaccines!! If you don’t believe me just google National Vaccine Ass. The truth is there!!

    Reply
  6. faith stanford  January 26, 2013 at 3:25 pm

    With EVERY thing in our goverment corupt and everything is about the bottom line, you relly think they spend the money to develop vaccines that are safest and most effective and would not sell something that could hurt you just to amke money? With the mutated food they are sponsored by, with the unecessary consumption of fosil fuels that we use at 100 Xs the rate at witch they can be created, with all there planned obsolesence and the paralazation of technology to keep this relical concept of an economy going so we can enslave ourselves to the 1%? You need to wake up while you still can. Its revolution or extinction.

    Reply
  7. Christina Waldman  May 29, 2013 at 5:47 pm

    Dr. Andrew Wakefield writes about this same scandal in his book, “Callous Disregard, Autism and Vaccines – The Truth Behind a Tragedy” (Skyhorse Publishing: NY 2010), Ch. 4, “The Whistleblower,” especially. His career was annihilated by powerful entities because he spoke out for vaccine safety, out of concern for the many vaccine-damaged children. Dr. Wakefield is suing Brian Deer, the journalist whose defamatory posts in 2004 began the campaign to destroy his reputation, as well as the British Medical Journal and its editor, Dr. Fiona Godlee, for articles the BMJ published Jan. 6, 2011. The case was heard May 22, 2013 in the Texas Third Court of Appeal on jurisdictional issues. Please don’t believe the misinformation the media spews about Dr. Wakefield. He may have been “discredited,” in the sense of “defamed,” but neither he nor his work was ever charged with fraud by the General Medical Council, and they spent five years looking for dirt on him. It is important to note that researchers critical of big Pharma can get targeted for “neutralization” or “discreditation.” We hear the same media messages over and over again; it is brainwashing. We have to be careful to search for independent truth; it is not easy with the current media, controlled as it is.

    http://www.examiner.com/article/measles-scare-the-associated-press-due-to-upcoming-jurisdictional-appeal

    Merck hit list University of California San Franscisco A Digital Library of Pharmaceutical Co. documents. search for “Merck neutralize” and 12 pdfs come up. http://dida.library.ucsf.edu/search?query=Merck+neutralize&ct=1

    Merck, maker of MMR vaccine, has significant financial ties to The Lancet and the British Medical Journal. http://www.ahrp.org/cms/content/view/766/9/ “BMJ and Lancet Wed to Merck CME Partnership,” 2/14/11. (CME is continuing medical education for doctors.) Essay by Martin Walker here and here http://www.ageofautism.com/2011/02/mercks-medical-media-empire.html.

    Reply

Leave a Reply