Ignore Cyprus at Your Own Risk

Louis James
Casey Research

Archimedes once said that if he had a lever long enough and a place to stand, he could move the world. Today, the half-Greek island of Cyprus appears to be the fulcrum, and the long arm of the EU may be the lever that heaves the entire world over the edge of the abyss.
As Dennis Miller so eloquently pointed out in a recent Casey Daily Dispatch, most Americans would not be directly affected if North Dakota decided to seize citizens’ money in order to pay its bills, but all Americans would be deeply disturbed by such an action. The principle of the matter couldn’t be clearer; outright theft is wrong. But it’d probably be fear, not principle, that would have people heading for their banks in droves to withdraw cash as fast as possible.

Of course, on a moral plane, government money printing is equally reprehensible and cowardly to boot; it takes value out of people’s savings just as surely as taking money out of their bank accounts, but in a hidden, indirect way. (One could make the same argument of taxation in general, unless it’s voluntary.) But again, most people won’t storm the Fed with pitchforks and torches as a matter of moral rectitude. They would, however, if the government simply reached into their bank accounts and seized money those people had planned to spend tomorrow.

And if North Dakota’s hypothetical troubles were mirrored in other, much more populous states, like New York and California, it’s easy to see how people in those states wouldn’t want to wait for their governments to do the same thing. This is the abyss toward which the EU’s hard line with Cyprus has pushed all of Europe.

Europeans living outside Cyprus should not kid themselves that this is just a Cypriot problem – anyone with a bank account in Greece, Spain, Italy, etc. should be thinking very hard about how safe their cash is from confiscation. As we go to press, the Cypriot parliament has backed away from the bank levy on everyone that caused so much uproar, but the new deal still seizes money from larger depositors. This does not undo the fact that it’s still stealing – nor that the ECB asked for some of every citizens’ savings. Europeans living in non-PIIGS countries should not kid themselves about the impact on themselves if the countries near default tumble like dominoes.
And people not living in Europe should not kid themselves into thinking that this is just a European problem; in today’s global economy, every country would get hurt by a banking and economic collapse in Europe. Those who think Asia will save the world must remember that the EU is China’s largest trading partner. Or was – who can say it will be tomorrow?

Key point: with a fractional reserve banking system, it doesn’t take a majority of bank depositors to decide to withdraw their cash to put their banks out of business. If something like 10% of depositors decided to withdraw all of their money, banks would be in real trouble – and even if only a smaller percentage were to initially decide to keep their cash at home, they could spook the required fraction into panicking and pushing the banks into insolvency. In stable times, fractional reserve banking may seem like free goodies for all, but during unstable times, it makes banks that much more precarious. Things have to be pretty dire for an entity like the ECB to demand action that could spark such a panic.

But wait – the banks are backed by the governments, so depositors are safe, right?

Yeah, right – the same bankrupt governments that are facing insolvency themselves…

Is This “IT?”

We’ve been saying for some time that the global house of cards could topple at the slightest rustling of the wings any of a number circling black swans. Something like the ECB turning draconian with Cyprus and scaring the heck out of everyone else in the EU seems more like a swan dive right into the heart of the teetering structure.

Many mainstream commentators are dismissing the significance of the Cyprus debacle – but the same type of people also dismissed the threat of the subprime crisis until it could no longer be denied.

This does not prove that what’s happening regarding Cyprus today is the tipping point future historians will point to as the beginning of the end of the EU and hence the rest of the old economic order. But it could be.

Skepticism from the mainstream does not prove that Doug Casey is right about the global economy exiting the “eye of the storm” this year, but it’s a great contrarian indicator.

What is absolutely clear is that the extreme measures the ECB has just shown it is willing to take are solid evidence that we are right about just how shaky things are – just how close to the crumbling edge of the abyss the whole world is.

Even if the direct, overnight theft of Cypriot bank deposits does not spark a bank run across Europe, it won’t change this fact. The ECB will certainly admonish us all to “pay no attention to the man behind the curtain,” but we’ve all seen the truth.

The question to ask is not, “How can we be certain?” That one’s easy to answer: we can’t be. The question to ask is, “What do I risk if this is it and I fail to prepare for the hell that’s coming two steps behind?”

To Doug, me, and all of us here at Casey Research, the answer to that is obvious: if we bet on the resumption of the economic storm and the so-called recovery continues, we’ll miss some opportunities and maybe lose some money on investments that don’t work out – but if we don’t make that bet and the economy does come unglued, we will suffer heavy losses.

If – Doug would say “when” – the wheels fall off the economic “recovery,” the vast majority of people will see a substantial reduction in their standard of living – and many will simply be wiped out. We don’t plan to be among them.

What to Do?

If the inevitable has now become imminent, the general recommendations that Doug Casey has offered many times before become even more applicable and important. They are:

  • Liquidate: Sell or dispose of any assets you have that might have been favored by the old economy, but are unlikely to hold value or generate income in the new one. That includes speculative real estate holdings in formerly hot markets and stocks in formerly invulnerable blue-chip companies. You might even sell your house, if you can, and rent instead. You should lighten your load in every way possible – even household junk filling your basement and attic – the storage unit you may be renting – anything you don’t truly need. Turn it into cash.
  • Consolidate: Cut your expenses to the bone and consolidate your assets into things that will hold value come hell or high water. The single best asset class for doing this is the precious metals: gold and silver. A substantial amount should be in cash form (coins). This is where you put your savings. Productive (not speculative) real estate is also good, but make sure it’s in a jurisdiction that is unlikely to see you as a victim to be fleeced for the public good. As Doug constantly reminds us, a critical element is getting a major portion of your assets offshore.
  • Speculate. With governments around the world on the verge of insolvency, most of them printing money by the helicopter-load, there are predictable economic consequences. Massive bubbles will be created, such as the one we see ahead in precious metals, and other bubbles will pop, like the collapse of more major corporations. There are no safe bets in such an environment (even gold can be confiscated if you leave it all in a jurisdiction that turns to stealing, as the EU has just shown it’s willing to do), so you’re better off speculating on a variety of bets placed on these trends. It’s possible in such volatile times to make a lot of money – this is the raison d’être of most of our publications.
  • Create: Despite all of the above, we are not apocalyptic, but actually quite optimistic, about the long term. In the coming years, the world is likely to change as radically as it did entering the industrial revolution – major change will impact everything: economy, politics, technology, demographics, social customs and mores, the military. Everything. This is a good time to look around and ask yourself what goods and services you can provide that people will need in the future. What worked during the late Long Boom won’t work in the future – in order to create, you’re going to have to think creatively, but it will be worth it. Life today is immeasurably richer than it was a thousand years ago, and in 100 years it will be better by a factor beyond our ability to comprehend. Maybe even 50. And in just 25, it will be beyond most people’s belief. Become a forward thinker, or become road kill.

Personally, I just sold my sports car and consolidated down to one vehicle. We really didn’t need two, and I’m using some of the proceeds to speculate on an emerging gold producer that has the potential to return ten times my investment. I plan to speculate on more great companies in the months ahead, especially if the market goes into a true panic, which it has not yet. Saving in gold has long been my practice, so that’s nothing new for me. As for the future, I plan two things: A) invest in technologies and companies I believe have great potential, starting with some of those covered by the Casey technology division; and B) work hard to keep myself from becoming obsolete.

Do not underestimate the importance of the latter; there is medical technology right around the corner that could drastically prolong the human lifespan. Everyone not at death’s door should have at least a 25-, if not 50-year financial plan.

How to Become a “Downturn Millionaire”

It’s the “speculate” component of Doug’s “liquidate, consolidate, speculate, and create” formula that most people have the most trouble with.

We’ve said many times that the essence of speculation is to buy low and sell high. The best way to do that is to buy when there’s blood in the streets – which is what is shaping up in the market now. Despite persistently high metals prices, there’s panic in the air, and few are willing to buy. It’s at times like these, when “everyone” has given up on a commodity, sector, or asset class that cannot dry up and blow away – like metals and mining – that you can buy at “stupid-cheap prices.”

We have documented and commented upon the weakening market for metals and mining stocks, particularly gold stocks, in these dispatches for some time now. We’ve pointed out the widening gap between the value the market is giving to good companies and the commodities that underlie them, such as gold, which has traded sideways, not down, over the last year – and at a price point previously deemed unsustainably high. It is clear to us that a potentially life-changing buying opportunity is shaping up today, and it may just be the Cyprus black swan that turns out to be the tipping point in our favor.

Now, no one can time a market bottom, except by accident. But when you can buy something that has to go up when it’s selling cheap, you can make a lot of money – if you have the patience to endure until it does go up. In the case of mining stocks today, we don’t think that patience will be required for a long time, but it will have to hold up to extreme volatility in the near term.

This is, frankly, not a viable plan for everyone. People prone to panic when stock in a good company drops 30% for no reason often end up inverting the speculator’s formula, buying high and selling low. But for those who have the discipline to stand by their judgment of what has value, regardless of what the rest of the market is saying, it’s times like these that create the most leveraged buying opportunities – opportunities that literally set the foundation for accumulating serious wealth.

The nature of success and failure in speculation: discipline and perseverance matter much more than strength or speed. It’s necessary, but not sufficient, to be right – you have to stay the course.

Key point: There’s a clear and present opportunity we see in the Cyprus crisis, which has already given the price of gold a shot in the arm. However it turns out, the cat is out of the bag as regards how the EU regards peoples’ savings, and that could lead to the next leg up in the gold market. If the whole system does topple over the edge of the abyss, it should spark a gold mania such as have never been seen before, not even during the famous spike of 1980.
It’s a matter of when – not if – the next gold mania hits. When it does, demand for companies that mine the yellow metal will escalate – creating profit opportunities that most investors dare not dream of. The biggest of these opportunities will be in select junior mining companies. Consider these gains in junior miners from previous precious-metals market rallies: Silverado Mines, 3,988%… Eagle River Mines, 3,478.9%… Goliath Gold, 7,011%… Francisco gold, 3,350%… there are many, many more such examples.

To help you get in on the ground floor of the coming precious metals mania, Casey Research has put together a very special online event: Downturn Millionaires. This free webinar will premier on April 8 and features some of the world’s most successful natural-resource speculators – like Doug Casey and Rick Rule – who will reveal how they made their fortunes in beaten-down markets and what you need to do to emulate their success.

Trending on the Web

9 Responses to "Ignore Cyprus at Your Own Risk"

  1. L Kampinghorse  April 5, 2013 at 7:56 am

    It’s not Cyprus that came up with the idea to do this it was and is The EU demanding they do this. It is the EU that ought to be disassembled. Merkel is no less than Adolf and the EU no less than the New Reich. Taking Europe by storm without firing a single shot..

  2. Eabe  April 5, 2013 at 10:47 pm

    Articles like this seem a little out of place on an activist website. Isn’t activism about creating a better world for all? This article boils down to creating personal wealth while the world suffers…

    Real noble.

    • deepbluesky  April 7, 2013 at 1:52 pm

      The article seems pretty straightforward and to the point. A short description of whats going on and practical solutions towards a more systainable lifestyle.It might touch a specific socio-economic demographic better than another one, that can be discussed, yet why isnt it noble if for example a household with a rather ressecion-resilient financial situation starts being more self systained and make smart choices depending the situation in there country / region? The people who have the capability/resources to go through the options outlined are probably the people who are going to help their communities. Not the rich who try to drain every bit of wealth out of the ‘lower-middle working’ classes. Oh, and it is everyones right to maintain whatever wealth they acquired through honest and ethical work. Can you say this isn’t noble?

    • Eabe  April 8, 2013 at 6:06 am

      “Oh, and it is everyones right to maintain whatever wealth they acquired through honest and ethical work.”

      What work is involved in investment? Aside from doing research of course. Nothing is actually being produced by the individual investor. Obviously this could start a large discussion about how the free-market functions and why investments create prosperity in the global picture, but I won’t get into that.

      The problem I have with the article is that it perpetuates a broken system overall – one where some must lose while others gain. The term “downturn millionaire” says it all. In a downturn, there is mass loss and suffering. To become a “downturn millionaire,” you must profit off that situation.

      “The people who have the capability/resources to go through the options outlined are probably the people who are going to help their communities.”

      This reminds me a lot of the “invisible hand” philosophy from Adam Smith, where as long as everyone looks out for their own self interest, the community will invariably prosper as a whole. Far as I can tell from this article, the only people who can take advantage of such investment are those with some capital to invest, such as the author after he sold his sports car.

      Perhaps I’m looking too far into the big picture and taking the term “activist” in “True Activist” too literal. I just find such an article out of place when it comes to activism and making positive changes for all. I personally subscribe to the notion that the planet would be better off without personal wealth, so obviously I will have a bias.

  3. deepbluesky  April 8, 2013 at 12:29 pm

    Why don’t we stick to basics? Yes, let’s not go to how the ‘free market’ functions and let’s leave Adam Smith out for a bit too (unless he personally posts a comment… ). The system is broken. Some realised it, others are processing still, a lot will never accept it until a person dies next to them, a bomb falls on their town or city , or they witness violence first hand (even raw footage from wikileaks doesn’t move some people to the slightest). The broken system will not change overnight though. We all hope it changes for the better (that’s why we are here, right?). But that broken system might hold anywhere from 1 day to 5 or more years (If anyone has any ideas on that, feel free to share). Unfortunately there’s no universal short message for awakening and global awareness, one that is written in a way that everyone who reads it will understand what is really going on. People need to be educated and informed, but people learn in different ways through different channels and according to their available time. How many people did you talk to in the last few days and you manage to give them a clear outline of what is really going on? Is it possible to influence them in a way that will make them do serious changes in their lives?
    The article is written by someone who is offering solutions that can be applied by some people. Yes, even if its just like a first aid responder who cleans the superficial woonds of an injured person, while waiting for the ER unit to come handle a suspected fracture, possibly a concussion and the shock of the whole thing. The patient and the caregiver don’t know the severity of the situation but nevertheless the caregiver will comfort the wounded (the article goes beyond that, eloquently).
    Anyone can be an activist to a certain degree ,by applying ideas he gets. There isn’t any activit-o-meter that i am aware of. Maybe an ‘activist-meme’ is set in motion and it can be expressed in many forms. An entrepreneur who is exchanging homemade jam for eggs with his neighbours. A businessman who owns a local gym, restaurant, dance school, small market, a farmer who can grow and distribute his/her own produce (in countries where its still ‘legal’. I kept the ‘titles’ used in the business world, like ‘entrepreneur’ on purpose. If you read the previous sentence and replace the ‘business slang’ with the word ‘person’, would it make it a more appropriate sentence for an activist page? The reason i am bringing this up is because everyone can be an activist by adapting to their specific environment. Not everyone is in the exact same state (physical, spiritual, financial etc) and the article will be read from a wide audience. People that still manage to get through the hardships can also start helping out. Lets not get confused with what we call them. Yes, your baker is a ‘business’ and so is the ‘business’ who sold you your chair and your laptop (might be an outlet or Johny the tech guy you knew from highschool). Both your baker (who still works with his banker because he doesn’t have a choice) and your tech outlet (or Johny) invested money. The baker is an investor, so is the outlet and so is Johny. Is the word ‘investor’ only used when there are stocks and bonds involved?
    Any solution will take time. Until then it is everyones choice to decide if they are going for the ‘downturn millionaire’ option or become fully engaged activists. Hey, Maybe the world needs more of those who can do both! But then again, one might say that this will bring back greediness just like before, and here goes the never-ending cycle of discussions.
    Cypriot citizens started taking actions any way they can. Petitions, letters to the parliament, even public lawsuits are prepared. Of course there are also riots. Surviving businesses lowered their prices, people gather food supplies and distribute to poor sections of towns, nutritionists educate people on how to re-adjust their meal plans and prepare for food shortages, doctors created community teams to offer basic medical care for those who can’t afford it. What they did was turn next to their fellow citizens in their communities. They also looked into what other people did in other countries, either through activist websites or even through social media shares and by talking to one another. A growing number of people are activists in one way or another. Some ways will work some will fail . Some might be activists but are not yet aware of it, by exchanging next-day/week ideas. How long do you think it would take someone to connect all the dots to the bigger idea? If its too late, well… its just like the situation where a pilot knows that his plane is going to crash in exactly 90 minutes. Will he inform the passengers? If so, at what time exactly? Hm.. What if there are 2 pilots in the cockpit?
    An article for positive changes for all will be so diluted, people unfortunately wont ‘buy’ into it (they might find it ‘cute’ or ‘witty’ on a post though). Any articles focused to specific demographics (not because that was the intention, but maybe just because the writer came from that group) might reach aits audience in a more convincing way, thus ‘raising’ the activist-o-meter.
    I am not attacking you. All i am saying is that the article made me and other people i have discussed it with think: ‘this guy has some good points. They will work for some people. Not for all, but for some. What good points can i come up with to make things better and produce positive changes for as many people as i can, now, today, for the following weeks?
    As long as personal wealth is considered, my standpoint is that for someone to be able to care and help for others, one must know how to first care for himself on a daily basis, especially in this volatile global enviroment – that would be a good topic to go into discussion, not Adam Smith and the ‘free-market’).
    Just a thought in the lines of Adam Smith: What if true activism is an ‘invisible hand of the Jon Doe’s out there?

  4. keepitreal  April 12, 2013 at 9:46 am

    This article is better suited to a tabloid business site, not an activist site. It almost seems like an “advertorial” for Casey research.

  5. Harrison Terran  July 8, 2013 at 12:01 pm

    In Cyprus to combat the economic slide, politicians must take to heart the problems of the common people by contacting those who are “in the know” about the economic crisis. Some counties in the US for example have used the services of the Orlando Bisegna Index to solve the problems of deficit, and unemployment. If it works on the small scale I don’t see it can’t work on a larger, national scale.


Leave a Reply